In Recovery

Rhythm

12/05/2009 · 9 Comments

RhythmSomething which really helps me when trying to see the wood for the trees is to look at church over time and try and get a sense of the bigger picture. Things seem to go through this natural rhythm, and I find the trick is to see where I am in this rhythm, but I’ll get to that in a second.
I had a conversation with someone the other day, around the proverbial water-cooler. The person I was speaking to seemed blown away by the idea that even though they don’t go to church anymore, they could still pursue God. They genuinely believed that if you didn’t go to a local church then you couldn’t be someone who is interested in God, and so my ‘water-cooler’ companion had just written Him off. This was someone, like many people, who had been to church as a teenager for youth, and then decided church was full of ‘controlling, anal, pains-in-the-asses’ who insisted they become just like them, and so they left.
The problem seems obvious to me: people have been throwing the baby out with the bath water because Christians have told them that they can’t be ‘Christians’ unless you go to a local church (usually one that looks very much like the one they attend). And the church (God’s people) have written them all off as wrong or ungodly in an effort to avoid the criticism. I told this person that I still thought it was important to walk the road with others in community, but if they couldn’t stomach big institutional church it was ok, find another way. The important thing was to connect with God and find others to walk the road with, not to walk away altogether because people in big churches have made you feel crap about yourself for not liking their culture.
But maybe people leaving churches is about more than we think. Church is always going through cycles of change, and very simply put, it goes something like this:
-Someone takes a look at the bible, listens to God, and takes an honest look at the church, and surmises that things aren’t as they should be.
-This idea begins to spread and people begin to get unhappy with the way things are and vote with their feet.
-The mainline institution closes ranks and gets miffed with those who question; killing them (or socially killing them in our ‘civilized’ day and age).
-Eventually those who see the holes move away and the church is reborn in some form.
-At some stage they become the new dominant ideology and institution forms around that… but it obviously has its own holes.
-One day, someone takes a look at the bible, listens to God, and takes an honest look at the church, and, well you get the idea.
And this has happens over and over again. Which brings us neatly to this weird kind of natural rhythm that church seems to go through every 500 years or so.
For our purposes lets start with Jesus and the early church.
500 years later the church was being formalised under the Emperor Constantine and it goes from an underground movement to the official religion of the Empire.
500 years later the church splits in half and the Greek Orthodox go east and the Roman Catholics go west.
500 years later the Reformation sparks off and a load of new denominations split off from Roman Catholic Church.
500 years later is, well… now.
So are we in for another shake up?
The numbers suggest we’re already in one, and the only people who don’t realise it are those in mainline western churches, whose attendance is on a rapid decline. Check the stats. Its a fact. For example I read an article last week saying that a website had been started in the UK where people could go and download ‘De-Baptism’ certificates, so they could fill them out and distance themselves from the church completely. So far over 100,000 people have responded, and I’m sure the number is rising. Do we just give up on these people assuming they just “aren’t elected or chosen”, or “its the signs of the times, and we just need to hunker down in our our churches”, or some other cliche we use as psychological armour?
Please no! How is THAT what God wants? How can we have the arrogance to just write off the masses who are evacuating our churches, and not at least ask if it has something to do with us, and the way we’re doing things. Simply invoking the idea that we’re God’s church is not a reason to suggest that we’re beyond criticism. History is littered with God’s people needed a kick in the ass. You don’t think its possible that we’re there again?
A friend of mine, Brett “the Fish” Anderson, reproduced my last blog post in his Facebook notes to generate some discussion among some of his friends (which I am happy for anyone to do BTW, just link them through to blog page as well). One girl commented below saying how disturbed she was that so many people are ‘bailing on the church’. She said that she was really frustrated with people who ‘give up’ on ‘God’s church’. Now hang on a minute. I don’t think people are giving up on ‘God’s’ church, they are giving up on ‘your’ church because they don’t think it is what its supposed to be. Many can’t articulate why, but they sense there’s something out of whack. This particular woman said that she loves the church and she’s disturbed that others don’t… but maybe they do. You wouldn’t have said the reformers didn’t love the church, for breaking away from the Catholic Church. You wouldn’t have said the Eastern Orthodox lot didn’t love the church because they broke away. You wouldn’t accuse the Catholics of not loving the church for holding their ground. Hopefully, at their best moments, each of these groups actually made their choices because they loved the church.
I acknowledge that many people just leave because they’re disgruntled and bitter, but even they may have a point if we would just listen.
I think the baseline question for me at the moment is, “Can the Western Institution of Church (and I’m talking very generally here) be sorted out? can it be re-imagined in time? Can it get back to more of what its meant to be?”
One of my mentors doesn’t think so. He thinks something ‘new’ needs to rise up in its place.
However, reading some of your responses, and listening to many of you over coffee, I get hope, and think that many of us are already on the same page.
Then listening to others my heart sinks as I realise that to change anything many of you have to first acknowledge the holes… and no one wants to see the holes in the thing they love. We want to make excuses for it, cover it up, live in ignorant bliss, because its easier.
The reason I am writing this stuff is that I believe it can be turned around… but its going to take some very big people with some very great humility.
So where are you in this whole thing? Are you acknowledging the gaps in the way we ‘are’ church, or are you battening down the hatches? In this next big shift are you part of the group looking for a way forward, or part of the Institutional defensive line?
But can we at least all agree to stop trying to make people who leave think that they can’t reach God outside of our little institutions? Lets agree to encourage people to pursue God no matter what, and we’ll work the details out as we go.
Its as good a place as any to start.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

9 responses so far ↓

  • Jacques // 12/05/2009 at 17:02 | Reply

    I’m acknowledging the gaps. I’ve seldom felt at home in the church. But then I’m an introvert that struggles to connect with other people – So maybe I’m biased.

    But still, I just don’t see the western church living the full gospel of Jesus Christ. Sadly I don’t think the masses were ever going to. Even sadder is the fact that Pastors themselves seldom live out the full expression of Kingdom life and therefore teach others a watered-down life in Christ.

    History is full of individuals who gave their all for Jesus. Literarily loosing themselves as they were recreated in the image of their Master. I don’t think these people were the ones that started new movements either.

    They were content to simply follow Jesus and let their lives be a picture of that commitment, their bodies a temple of the Holy Spirit where others could come and meet God.

    I don’t think these people generally left the tradition in which they were formed. But I think that they understood the limitations of that tradition and relied on the Holy Spirit, not the tradition, to draw them closer to God.

    The experience of God is a gift of the Holy Spirit and is not dissuaded by tradition or doctrine. As long as the seeker is truly seeking God and not relying on tradition or doctrine to get him/her there.

    Therefore I don’t think that the institutional church will ever be truly reformed. I do think that people will notice those followers of Christ who really allow themselves to be changed by the Spirit.

    I also think that all Christian traditions will continue to follow the pattern that you describe. However, we must remember that even when a great change occurs and new forms of church are born, the old forms don’t necessarily die out.

    The majority (over 50%) of Christians are still Roman Catholic. And the Roman Catholic Church has undergone a number of internal reforms aimed at bringing Jesus back to the centre of the institution. I’m thinking here of the ecumenical councils, the Counter Reformation, Vatican 1, Vatican 2 and the Charismatic renewal.

    Likewise, many Protestant groups have times of struggle and times of renewal.

    Through all of this some feel that they cannot make it work within the old structure and leave to create another structure that doesn’t work.

    Perhaps we should all simply acknowledge that the structure is never going to work and simply get on with following Jesus. If that creates conflict between ourselves and the structure then it is as Jesus said it would be.

    If we are kicked out of some forms of the structure then we dust off our feet and keep going. If we find ourselves outside the structure from some length of time – that’s okay, it’s not about the structure anyway. And if ultimately the structure kills us for following Jesus then we will find ourselves modelling the life of many great Christians and of Jesus Himself.

    Much Love in the Lord Jesus

    Jacques

  • Phinley // 12/05/2009 at 20:43 | Reply

    dude. you know i read all your blogs, but here’s my problem: i can never really find too much to say, except, “Exactly! Preach on Brother!”
    So now I’ve said it and I don’t have anything else to add.
    Next time you see me comment is when I see you stirring deeper waters.

  • Phinley // 12/05/2009 at 20:54 | Reply

    oh. here’s an idea that came to me today. you see i was discussing a few issues with a Ugandan Brother, Mark Ogama and we were talking about how if we opened a nightclub and a church place/building/establishment right next to each other on the same day, by the same owner – how it would be that the nightclub would grow sooner than the church. and that prompted both of us to think the same thought at the same time…”The Nightclub Church”!

    Seriously, we’re all seeing the shortcomings of the westernized institution of the church and we’re also seeing how resistant She is to change from within, so is it not time for young and ordinary radicals to stop trying to fix a wobbling wheel, but rather – by His Holy Spirit – to build a whole new vehicle?

    why are young disciples allowing ourselves to get caught up in something that saps the very life out of us? why are we not walking with Christ into shebeens and brothels and turning this world upside down, just like He did?

    when will we? for i am certain that upon that day, the Church will move with 1st century force, gaining ground that we have not even been able to dream of.

  • Thomas // 12/05/2009 at 21:07 | Reply

    I’ve checked in to your blog from time to time. Where does one begin?

    This post dwells on the decline. The experience of my own (“traditional”) Church is growth and vitality. I’ve done postgraduate studies in what the decline is all about.

    Fellowship is crucial, for various reasons (beyond the scope of a brief comment), but not to deny that one can be alone as a Christian.

    I myself seriously burnt out once. I needed “recovery”, but I returned to my own Church. I see a lot in your posts where I think, “But no, wait, it can really be different.”

  • Gavin Marshall // 13/05/2009 at 09:11 | Reply

    Has it ever occurred to you that perhaps this very faith you profess is a result of the church, or perhaps the other way around, that the church is a result of the faith, the belief system. What I’m seeing very often is people questioning and even moving away from the church, but too still hanging on to the belief system – that ’caused’ the church in the first place. So you shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater? I’m saying that you’re not taking it far enough…
    Theology always has a context. Now the context has changed radically from, say, 100 years ago. Our culture, cosomology and understanding of ourselves is so much different and yet the theology is still at least 200 years old. So this is manifesting in a growing uneasiness with the institution, but I don’t believe the problem lies with the institution. You can’t change the institution – that we seem to agree on. What you can change is yourself – and that starts with looking at your own beliefs and being brutally honest.
    Honesty is hard to come by in the church – everyone is so busy trying to convince themselves to believe…

  • Sean Tucker // 13/05/2009 at 11:15 | Reply

    I agree that we need to ‘update’ our theology and ideas about God, but I still feel like this stuff is true. I had a pretty unique journey with church in that I went after God long before I could get to a church. From day one at church (when I was about 18) I was working for them, feeling like outsider. I came to them with ideas about God, which they didn’t give me, and those I want to hold on to because some good part of me believes its true. I know all the arguments better than most, and yet I still believe there is a God, that Jesus was, and did, something significant. I believe that we are messed up, when left to our own devices. I believe that God, who made it all, wants to move things back to what things were meant to be at the start. And I believe He’s keen to involve us.

    I just think that the trick at this point is to get back to the good stuff whilst removing the layers of church-culture-forming crap we have built around it for years.

  • Gavin Marshall // 13/05/2009 at 12:41 | Reply

    Ideas, theology, belief, feeling like this stuff is true – but do you really believe what you believe. How do you know that it isn’t a product of ideas, theology and belief? There’s no way of knowing …
    until you strip it to the core – cutting away at everything and seeing what stands the test..
    Church certainly didn’t stand the test, so what is the next to go. How far are you willing to go? How desperately do you want to know the truth?
    Too many people start out well, but when the going gets tough, slip right back into the institution, whether it’s the old one, or another of their own making.

  • Thomas // 13/05/2009 at 13:35 | Reply

    I’ve just completed a postgraduate degree in Church leadership, focusing particularly on distress in ministry. I say yes and no to the notion that the trouble with the Church today is that it’s stuck in the past. My research showed that some of the most serious trouble with the Church today is due to recent developments with regard to how we “do Church”. I used a deconstructionist critique, so that is what I discovered without coming from any particular “platform of truth”.

  • Mark Neville // 18/05/2009 at 21:59 | Reply

    Nothing to add. Just to reiterate Gavin Marshall’s comment that “honesty is hard to come by in the church – everyone is so busy trying to convince themselves to believe…” and Sean’s rejoined that “yet I still believe there is a God, that Jesus was, and did, something significant. I believe that we are messed up, when left to our own devices. I believe that God, who made it all, wants to move things back to what things were meant to be at the start. And I believe He’s keen to involve us.” resonates with me in a profoundly thought-provoking way. Thank you both.

Leave a Comment